문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
강케이 양승진 강x 씨.발 다쳐박다가 드.디.어
-
이미 5개년 2회독 옛기출 언어영역 부터 봤고 6모 백분위 97인데 새로운 지문에...
-
가끔 수학에서 못풀고 풀이 봤는데 ‘아니 씁....하...이게맞나? 이건 좀...
-
현 고2 정시파이터입니다. 연고대 경영경제를 가고싶어서 수학 선택과목과 사탐 선택을...
-
개천절에도 사탐런한다는건 농담이 아님 ㅇㅇ
-
100일 1
100일도 안남았는데 김승리 올오카부터 앱스키마 다듣는건 역시 무리겠져? 하루 최대...
-
물리 브릿지 1
물리 브릿지 전국 1회부터 10회 등급컷 있나요?
-
틀린문제 : 32 난이도 : 쉬움 법지문좋음 이상
-
나이가 외적 조건이 될 수 있다고 생각하시나요? 일단 전 아님 상상 모고 풀어봤는데...
-
퀄리티 차이인가요?
-
박종민쌤 커리 0
벅종민 쌤 정규반 커리가 어떻게 되나요? 그리고 개인컨 가격이 얼만가요?...
-
알려주시면 감사하겠습니다
-
왜 이러지 바뀐건 하나도없는데
-
어디까지내려가는거에여
-
대학 어디가로 충북대 내신 산출해본건데 혹시 여기서 어떤것 보면서 전년도 입결과...
-
불교 파트에 천태종 화엄종 정토종 정확하게 구별하는 문제랑, 한국 무속 신앙(고조선...
-
갤러리 뒤지다가 21년 수능 성적표를 보게 되었는데 당시에는 너무 못 봐서 모의지원...
-
신혁이가 좋다 3
좋아
-
기출 따로 안 봐도 될까요? 6평 풀어봤는데 77 나와서 어제부터 수학...
-
10만원어치 일본가서산 굿즈 치킨..아니 아메리카노...아니 컵라면..
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ