문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
미적분 피지컬 벌크업하고싶습니다 뉴런 필요한 부분만 듣고 4규로 양치기 하면서...
-
연논 0
연논 1~2명 빠지는과 뭔의미임? 전전은 한바퀴넘게 돌던데
-
어그로X 19짤 3
제가 직접 찍은건데 어때요?
-
찾아보니 세특이랑 표준편차 등등 고려하고 aa를 잘 안준다는데요, 작년에 연세대...
-
모의랑 간쓸개 몇개씩나옴?
-
집에가고싶다 0
친구가 동네 드라이브하자해서 잠깐 차탔다가 여의도까지 납치당함
-
d-60 0
불꽃가능 가보자고
-
ㄹㅇ 제발...
-
기생충 0
마지막 장면만 유툽에 쳐서 봤는데 너무 우울해짐..
-
수학 실모 ㅈㄴ 사서 13 14 15 21 22 28 29 30만 푸는데.. 효율...
-
설마 추석 끝나고 오나어
-
난 내가 못하는줄 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 휴
-
현 3등급 나오는 인간인데 2등급 나올때까지 프리퀀시 ㅈㄴ 반복하고 2 뜨면...
-
약학과 최고경쟁률 아주대 약학과 5명선발 4413명지원 882.60:1
-
좋은 아침이에요 3
즐거운 추석~
-
저 작년 수능 끝나자마자 19패스 사전예약해놔서 1년 내내 배송비 무료임
-
운동할때 입을 옷들 샀어 ㅎㅎㅎ
-
안녕하세요, 혹시 생2 uaa 프로모터 비킬러 문제에 대한 질문 받아주실 수 있는...
-
한수 7회 후기 2
독서 -5 문학 -3 언매 -0 92점. 1컷 85 독서 비행기 양력 지문이...
-
19일에 연휴끝나서 너무슬픈데 어떡해???ㅠㅠㅠㅠ
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ