문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
재종이랑 관리형 독서실이랑 고민중입니다 재종은 좀 먼 거리지만 셔틀버스가 있습니다...
-
뉴진스 gods 듣기 작수 끝나고 롤드컵보며 gods를 들었던 겨울이 생각남..
-
히히
-
1학년부터 시작 vs 3학년부터 시작 달성 난이도는 엇비슷해보이는데 전자는 2년 늦음 뭐가 좋을까여
-
이차곡선과 직선 개념 끝 다들 기하합시다!
-
공유도 괜찮아용 김민경쌤 하나 들었습니다.
-
윤사하는사람 0
공자맹자 구분어케함 문제에서볼때마다 구분이안되는디
-
국어 인강은 어느 정도 실력이 있을 때 봐야 할까요?? 1
국어 인강 듣는데 어떤 쌤은 계속 지문 풀기 전에 6분, 7분 이렇게 시간 제한을...
-
중에 단과 아무거나 들으면 국어 수업 안 들어도 모의고사 구매 가능한 힉원...
-
망할 효율충 0
요즘 공부개쪼금하는느낌만 들음
-
안녕하세요 독서칼럼 쓰는 타르코프스키입니다. 여러분은 지문을 읽다가 이해할 수 없는...
-
여행지 와서도 집안 빨래가 오지게 쌓여서 세탁기에다 이염방지제 넣고 빨래 돌리고...
-
국어 파이널 0
일취월 풀커리 탔고 지금 마닳 무한회독 하는중인데 파이널 장클로 충분할까요?...
-
꼭 제한 시간 안에 풀어야 하나요 3등급이라서 시간 안에 풀기는 빡셀거같은데...
-
현역들 최저 거의 영어 끼워서 맞춰야하는데 의대 증원까지 됐는데 최저 맞춘 사람...
-
웬만한건 해석이 되지만 순삽같은 고난도 유형에서 두개씩은 나가는 애매한...
-
6:30에 바로 현장응시 …… 슝
-
하지만 추석 연휴가 있으니...
-
친한 동기한테 특정당한거 말고는 없네요
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ