문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
현역이라 시간이 너무 없는데 1,2 단원은 잘하는데 공간도형은 4점 문제 들어가면...
-
글이 이상한건지 내가 이상한건지...
-
추석특강 때문에 한티 가는데 한티는 첨이라..
-
행복하겠지만 너를 위해 기도할게
-
수특 수12 0
아니 계산실수 ㅈㄴ 나네 한단원에 2개씩 꾸준히 처 틀리는 중
-
다 1지망으로 가버려.....난 여기가 1지망이라고
-
수능끝나고 연락해볼까 나 잘챙겨주셨는데
-
상관관계가 있는 것이지 인과는 아닙니다.
-
서울 광역 자사고(ㅎㄷㅂㄱ)인데 3점 중반입니다 건국대 국어국문학과 붙을 수 있을까여
-
[단독] 분당서울대병원 “사전 조율 없는 뇌졸중 환자 수용하기 힘들다” 1
응급실 가도 수술 어려울 듯 국내 대표적인 대형 병원인 분당서울대병원이 당분간...
-
어제 경찰차탐 2
집도싫고 재수도싫고 삶이 아무의미가없는거같았음 학원끝나고 새벽세시까지 걍 발닿는대로...
-
아수라 도착 1
영롱하군
-
?? ?? ??
-
귀여윤거보실분 0
롯데자이언츠 카리나 시구도와준 190cm 97kg 박준우임
-
오야스미 0
네루!
-
벌써 9월 반 ㄷㄷㄷ
-
미적분 피지컬 벌크업하고싶습니다 뉴런 필요한 부분만 듣고 4규로 양치기 하면서...
-
연논 0
연논 1~2명 빠지는과 뭔의미임? 전전은 한바퀴넘게 돌던데
-
모의랑 간쓸개 몇개씩나옴?
-
집에가고싶다 0
친구가 동네 드라이브하자해서 잠깐 차탔다가 여의도까지 납치당함
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ