문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
운동을 어떻게 해야할까요 푸쉬업말구 할 수 있는게 없네..
-
넓이로 요리조리 하는거 재밌네요강대x는 어떨까
-
짤녀 어떰? 3
우리 애깅이
-
혹시 시간 되신다면 잠시 쪽지좀 주실수 이쓸까요 (소수어과시면 더욱 좋아용)
-
낼 대치가서 먹을라 하는데
-
주제 : 12시 10분까지 정답 안 나오면 댓글로 알려줌 난이도 : 매우쉬움 ~...
-
너무 행복하다 잠이 최고야
-
위크오프를 해버렷
-
올해 나올확률 어느정도라고 보시나요?
-
고전소설 친척 호칭 뇌절 총정리 ㅇㅇ 모르겠는거 있음 이거보셈 0
요즘 여기저기서 뇌절치길래 한번쯤은 정리하면 ㄱㅊ겠다싶어서함 말도 안되는건...
-
극찬하는 사람들이 있어서 다들 어떻게 느끼심 교육청 문항임요
-
몸에서 ㅈ같은 냄새가 나잖아
-
표피낭종 제거 티눈 제거 진짜 쾌감 미침
-
ㅠㅠ
-
통통이와는 급이 다른 재미
-
질문받는다 3
ㄱㄱ
-
선지가 너무 쫀쫀하던데 맞음? 지문은 쉬웠는데 의문사가 많더라.어땠음
-
물리 3초중반 백분위 85~87정도에 국어 99 수학 98 영어 1 지구 100...
-
25학년도 고등학교 입학생부터 교육과정이 바뀐다고 들었는데... 수학 선행할 때...
-
반출생주의, 저출생 지지합니다 ㅇㅇ
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ