문제 퀄 평가좀
---
Peer review is a cornerstone of scientific research, intended to ensure the quality and validity of published studies. However, this process has limitations that can affect the advancement of science. Peer review often relies on the opinions of a limited number of reviewers, which can lead to biases or narrow viewpoints. Reviewers may favor studies that align with current theories or those that are more likely to produce positive results, potentially overlooking innovative or unconventional research.
Additionally, the peer review process can be slow and may not always identify flaws in experimental design or analysis. This can delay the dissemination of important findings and impact the reproducibility of research. The system's emphasis on publication quantity over quality can also lead to pressure on researchers to produce results quickly, sometimes at the expense of thoroughness.
**_____________________________**
If these issues are not addressed, the peer review process may hinder scientific progress rather than facilitating it.
---
**Question:**
1. Consequently, the peer review system may inadvertently perpetuate existing biases and limit the scope of scientific inquiry.
2. Thus, the constraints of peer review can result in the exclusion of valuable but unconventional research.
3. Therefore, the peer review process might contribute to the slow advancement of scientific knowledge.
4. As a result, peer review may not always ensure the rigor and validity of scientific studies.
5. In conclusion, the limitations of peer review highlight the need for more innovative approaches to evaluating scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
---
###
Scientific research often relies on funding from various sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profits. However, the source of funding can introduce biases into research outcomes. Studies funded by private companies may be more likely to produce results that favor the sponsor’s interests, potentially skewing the scientific evidence. Furthermore, the competitive nature of funding can pressure researchers to focus on topics that are more likely to attract financial support rather than on high-risk, high-reward research. This can lead to a concentration of resources in certain areas while neglecting others that are equally important but less lucrative. **_____________________________** If these biases are not addressed, funding sources may distort scientific research priorities and outcomes, impacting the integrity of scientific knowledge.
---
**Question:**
Which of the following best completes the blank in the article?
1. funding biases may compromise the objectivity of scientific research and skew results in favor of certain interests.
2.the reliance on specific funding sources can shape research priorities and influence outcomes.
3. the impact of funding on research may lead to a focus on topics that are more commercially viable rather than scientifically valuable.
4. funding biases can affect the impartiality and breadth of scientific studies.
5. addressing funding biases is essential for maintaining the integrity and diversity of scientific research.
**Answer:**
Option
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
감속팽창 질문 1
감속팽창한다고 해서 우주 파장이 짧아지는 건 아니죠? 여전히 팽창하니까 파장은 길어지나요?
-
ㅇㅇ
-
이감 파이널 (시즌5, 시즌6) 다 풀었는데 이제 뭐할까? 1
이감 전회차를 푼 건 아니고 파이널에 해당하는 시즌5, 시즌6만 풀었음 이제 국어...
-
졸립군아... 2
자게 해다오...
-
성공 3
-
아니 유튜브 이상한 댓글 밑에 대댓글들 다 로봇임? 2
무슨 300명이 똑같은말쓰냐
-
"전쟁이 김정은에 무슨 이익을 가져다줄까?"를 생각하면 됨. 전쟁은 반드시 국가의...
-
너만을 사무치게 그리워 하였다
-
피파 베일 출시 이틀전 11
ㅅㅅ
-
죽음이다 진짜
-
ㅅㅂ
-
1. 구주연마 문학파트만 2. 그의 유산 3. 김상훈티 문학론 뭐가 가장...
-
제 이야기는 아님
-
쓸모없는 짓만 했구나
-
요새 시험기간이라 새벽 네 시에야 10모 풀어봤네요 일단 물2만 봤는데, 괜찮게 푼...
-
님들이라면 뭐있나요? 다년간의 수험생퐐, 군생활이 끝나고 인생의 목표가 사라지는데 뭐하는게 좋을까요
-
교육과정바뀌기전에소장해놓기...
-
님들은 9모 국어 모르는 문제 있으면 질문 어디에 함? 10
인강 듣는데 질문 게시판 조교님들이 강의에서 안 다룬 9모 문제들은 질문 안 받는대...
선지들 촘촘하네요 ㄷㄷ